Editor’s note: I earn commissions from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect editors’ opinions or ratings.
There are many things investors cannot control, such as market trends, corporate management decisions, and Federal Reserve policy. But he does have one key piece that investors can control. That is the fee that the investor pays.
Minimizing investment fees may feel like solace compared to the impact of Federal Reserve policy on the market. But seemingly insignificant fees can significantly reduce wealth in the long run. Additionally, research shows that investments with higher fees often perform worse than those with lower fees.
Let’s take a closer look at how much investment costs are consumed over the life of an investment portfolio and what needs to be done to minimize investment costs.
High cost of small fees over a long period of time
To get a clear picture of the cumulative impact of fees on your investment portfolio, you need to take a long-term view.
Consider a model portfolio consisting of 80% stocks and 20% bonds. According to wealth manager Index Fund Advisors, there should have been returns of just over 10% a year since 1928.
If a young investor bought this model portfolio with a starting balance of $10,000 and then contributed $100 each month over a 45-year career, it would end up being worth about $1.6 million before fees. period.
Now let’s assume that the model portfolio charges an annual fee equal to 1% of its value. That looks like a good amount, right? But over 45 years, this seemingly insignificant fee would consume almost a third of the final portfolio balance. It’s worth about $1.1 million, with charges totaling about $480,000.
If the portfolio only charged a 0.50% fee, it would have a final value of $1.3 million and only spend $216,000 in fees over the life of the investment.
Expense Ratio Fee and Financial Advisor Fee
There are various fees in the investment industry. Two of the most common fees an investor pays are his expense ratio and advisory fee.
What is the expense ratio?
Mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded funds charge an annual expense ratio. This is a fee equivalent to a percentage of the total investment in the fund. For example, an expense ratio of 0.50% indicates that the fund will deduct half of his 1% of the amount an investor holds in the fund each year.
The Fund may also charge various additional fees. Managers pass on the costs of buying and selling securities owned by the fund. The more a fund trades, the higher its costs, and investors pay these costs on top of the expense ratio.
Some mutual funds charge investors a front-end or back-end loading fee. A load fee is a sales fee charged when you buy a stock (front-end load fee) or sell a stock (back-end load fee). A typical initial investment fee in the mutual fund industry is his 5.75% of the investment amount.
How much does a financial advisor charge?
Advisor fees are the costs charged for hiring a financial advisor. Similar to mutual fund expense ratios, many investment advisors charge a percentage of the total assets under management.
But advisors, among other investments, often direct investment funds to funds and pass on those fund fees to you as well. If you add the advisor’s fees and the fund’s expense ratio, the total annual fees could easily exceed his 2%.
Continuing the example above, a 2% fee would reduce the lifetime value of the model portfolio by approximately $800,000. please think about it. A seemingly high fee would halve the value of the portfolio in 45 years.
Average investment trust expense ratio
The fees in the example above are mostly fictitious. An important question arises here. What is the actual average expense ratio charged by mutual funds?
Expense ratios vary widely from fund to fund. Passive index funds typically have the lowest fees, and index fund fees of less than 10 basis points are not uncommon. For example, Vanguard index funds are known for their very low fees, while Fidelity offers index funds with zero expense ratios.
Actively managed funds are much more expensive. Since managers of active funds have to work harder to beat their benchmarks, higher fees cover more costs involved in evaluating and selecting securities. Expense ratios for actively managed mutual funds are not uncommon above his 1%.
According to a study released in March 2020 by the Investment Company Institute (ICI), the association representing regulated funds globally, the average expense ratio for equity mutual funds was 52 basis points in 2019. A passively managed equity mutual fund.
Actively managed equity mutual funds averaged 74 basis points in 2019, according to ICI research. Passively managed index equity mutual funds averaged just 7 basis points in 2019. to the ICI.
How to find your expense ratio
Studies of average mutual fund expense ratios are interesting, but what really matters is the actual fees you end up paying. It is important to know how to find out the expense ratio for mutual funds already in your portfolio or for mutual funds you are considering.
Most major mutual fund companies have their mutual fund expense ratios readily available on their websites. This information is also included in each mutual fund’s prospectus and is also generally available on the company’s website.
This information can also be found on Morningstar’s website and other investment websites. In many cases, information can be obtained simply by searching online for the ticker symbol of the mutual fund you are considering.
you don’t get what you pay for
It’s not all about investment fees. Some might argue that what really matters is the investment’s after-fee return. The high fees charged by actively managed mutual funds may be justified if post-fee returns outperform comparable index his fund investments.
But history shows that actively managed funds often lag behind their lower-cost competitors. S&P Global publishes data comparing the performance of US equity managers compared to relevant benchmarks. Called the SPIVA US Scorecard, the results don’t bode well for actively managed mutual funds.
According to the SPIVA Scorecard report, 70% of domestic equity funds lagged the S&P Composite 1500 Index, a very broad measure of equity market performance, in 2019. Looking back over the past decade, these results have not improved. Each S&P 500 over the last decade. To be fair, results for other asset classes may improve year-on-year.
For example, mid- and small-cap managers tend to perform better. His 68% of mid-cap funds outperformed the S&P Mid-Cap 400 in his 2019, according to a SPIVA report. However, in the decade to 2019, 84% of mid-cap funds and 89% of small-cap funds underperformed their benchmarks.
In short, higher fees do not mean better returns after fees. If that’s not bad enough, it gets worse.
Lower investment fees may correlate with better performance
Research shows that there is a noticeable gap between the average return earned by a particular mutual fund and the average return earned by investors in the same fund. In investing, timing is everything. This gap can be explained by when investors buy and sell mutual fund positions and how long they have been held.
By evaluating the investment flows into and out of mutual funds, we are able to calculate an investor’s average return and compare it to the fund’s actual return. Morningstar conducts this analysis and publishes the results in an annual survey called Mind the Gap.
Such a recent Morningstar survey revealed an interesting relationship. Morningstar has found that lower fees tend to result in higher returns for investors. For example, Morningstar found that in the highest-priced equity fund, investor returns lagged total returns by 2.2% (3.59% vs. 5.79%). In contrast, the gap was half that for the cheapest fund (6.56% vs. 7.66%).
So what is the relationship between fees and an investor’s average return? Morningstar points out that cost can be a good predictor of a fund’s performance. He also notes that low-cost funds may attract better investors. There is another possibility.
With low-cost index funds, returns are completely independent of the fund’s management team. The fund simply follows the market with minimal fees. However, for actively managed funds, investors should always ensure that the fund’s management team is making sound investment decisions. A year or more of stagnation makes it difficult for investors to keep their funds.
Whatever the explanation, one thing is clear. That means investment fees should be kept to a minimum.